Here's a rare (for me) contribution to the "General Discussions" category.
In my ten months on PS --- given all of its benefits and good points, which are many --- I've seen more inter-Pagan squabbling about the inherent validity of an(y given) individual's chosen path than I have in over fifteen years of formal practice.
Some of the debate concerning the finer points of closely related paths (for example, "Is it possible to self-initiate as a Wiccan?" or "Has Wicca become too commercialized?") are understandable, and can even be healthy in some regards.
However: Wiccans belittling Heathenism, Heathens belittling Ceremonial Magic, Ceremonial Magicians belittling Satanism, Satanists belittling Wicca --- wholesale and with no direct and intimate personal experience or knowledge of that path* --- this makes no sense to me whatsoever . . . Unless the critical party is somehow threatened by the existence of that path, or feels compelled to dismiss it outright to bolster their own self-concept, sense of authority, or feeling of authenticity.
This is not a call to feel-goodism, the abandonment of reason or healthy judgment, or some artificial or hypocritical form of inclusion or false egalitarianism. And, needless to say, if someone from Pagan Path "X" comes proselytizing to you --- all bets are off.
This is a question for anyone who cares to answer: What does anyone, as a Pagan (by whatever stretch of definition you choose to assign that term), stand to gain from the denigration or objective invalidation of another Pagan path in one's self-definition?
Would it not be essentially better to "mind one's own path" (using the self as a primary referent, rather than someone else)?
*Sorry --- books, FAQs, websites, and "a Circle you attended at a festival" do not constitute direct and intimate personal experience or knowledge.
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This