Tags:
Permalink Reply by Barrackubus on April 14, 2012 at 3:30pm
Permalink Reply by Vigdisdotter on April 14, 2012 at 6:36pm How am I seeing what is not there
You'd understand if you actually used logic and basic reading comprehension. Try again.
Permalink Reply by Regan RayRay Denmire on April 14, 2012 at 5:47pm No. No man should have the option to MAKE me carry a baby that I do not want! If he wants to opt out of fatherhood then he should take the precautions to not be a father. If a man has sex unprotected he is making the choice that he wants to be a father, same goes for women in certain circumstances...but what if she is on birthcontrol and it fails? She did her part, but the man decides that he won't wear protection because he is going to rely on her birthcontrol..she becomes pregnant. She does not want the child, which is why she was using birth control, but now the man has the option to tell her that she has to keep it??? THis makes no sense to me. MY body, MY choice. I could care less if the father wanted the baby...if I choose to terminate it is my business.
Permalink Reply by Regan RayRay Denmire on April 14, 2012 at 8:29pm If they don't want to be involved as a father then they should WEAR A CONDOM!!!!
Permalink Reply by Regan RayRay Denmire on April 15, 2012 at 12:05am But here is the problem Rose...men opt out all the time. They say they want the baby and everything is fine...then they leave. There is proof of this all through our wefare systems. And child support is no help..My oldest daughter is about to be 18, I have not had one child support payment her entire life. Her "father" gets jobs and quits them as soon as child support tracks him down, he works under the table and he moves all the time. We were married, he wanted this baby, then when things went bad he "opted Out" so no, I don't think a man should have a choice, because if he doesn't want the child...he can just leave.
Permalink Reply by Kadactyl on April 15, 2012 at 1:02am I understand his idea but disagree. I think when men get the option to carry a child, they can also have the choice to terminate the pregnancy. I understand that, to some, fathers have a say because they believe it is morally right. But you can't make someone carry a child. It's messed up.
Also the thought of making someone carry a child reminded me of a 'breeding class' like in The Giver.
Permalink Reply by Regan RayRay Denmire on April 14, 2012 at 1:42am So what you are saying is that two people have unprotected sex, one gets pregnant, and they should both have a say in what should happen with the embryo? Which of these two people are going to have to carry this fetus in thier body for nine months...endure the stretching skin, swollen ankles, and aching back, and the grand finalee of labor and birth? What if these two people do not know each other that well? Should the woman carry the baby to term and give it to this practical stranger, just because he invokes a parental right?? What if he invokes this right and then when the woman has the baby...he takes off? Now she has a child to care for and no father to take resposibility. This hardly seems fair. I spent time on my externship working at an abortion clinic...and I did not envy those women. They were making a very hard decision, and I heard them all. Some were still in high school, some were still in college, one young girl was carrying her fathers baby. Should these women have to put thier entire lives and careers on hold because someone else wants them to?? It is not the man that will have ot worry about finding a sitter while he goes to school, it is not the man that has to take the child to the doctor, it is not the man sacrificing his time for a child, it is the mother. Therefore, until there can be an equal sharing of the burdon of childrearing (and I am not jsut talking about monitary) then it is the womens choice, period.
Permalink Reply by bob on April 14, 2012 at 10:28am i no several woman that had several abortions and the man wanted to keep it,most woman did it to make the man suffer
it happend to me,so sayin it dont hurt noin you could of took care of your child (the father) is bullshit
if you cant handle the responsability stop havein unprotected sex (men and women)
if a man and woman decide to keep the child and she renigs because shes mad at her man then to me its not about a womans body its bein a bitch
any man that cant take care of there child is a fuckin loser that goes for woman to
Permalink Reply by Vigdisdotter on April 14, 2012 at 11:18am Strawman. It has nothing to do with what does or doesn't hurt the father because it's not the father's choice. Whatever her reasoning, whether or not she's a "bitch"(nice stop language, so charming) doesn't matter. It's HER body, it's HER choice.
Permalink Reply by bob on April 14, 2012 at 11:26am thats your opinion,
It has nothing to do with what does or doesn't hurt the father because it's not the father's choice.its both there choice they both put there self in that position
anyone that uses a child out of anger is a bitch and it does hurt the father
Permalink Reply by Vigdisdotter on April 14, 2012 at 12:00pm No it's not my opinion, it's the law. HER body, HER choice.
© 2013 PaganSpace.net
Powered by
Badges | Privacy Policy | Report an Issue | Terms of Service
