Instant gratification is a bit like instant oatmeal, just add water and you have something that is nourishing, for a moment, but it does not last.
There have been a few discussions out here that have mentioned instant gratification and the effects it has on the Pagan movement, but in my eyes, it has not been discussed at great length.
I know that there are many Pagans who have the attitude of "I want what I want and I want it now!" There is not a problem with this attitude, for the most part, but where I take issue is when this attitude comes into conflict with spiritual practices that this type of attitude will not adhere too, examples are traditions that take more than the attention span of a 2 year old to understand and learn.
I admit that, at times, I do have the attitude "I want what I want and I want it now." I am human after all. How do I combat this? By understanding the long term results of fully understanding what I am doing, on my own personal spiritual path.
I am also going to address this issue of Native Americans, and their spiritual life, that is if they have one. I am a wee bit tired of individuals saying that others have shit on Native American traditions, when in some cases Native Americans are not even actively practicing their spiritual path. Tell me something. How is that desecrating their spiritual path? I do understand the whole profiting off of the Native American name, or tribe, and I think that is just utter chicken droppings. I can not stand un-authentic people let alone con artists, which I see individuals who profit off of any spiritual practice that they have not be educated about.
So let us open up a bit of a discussion about this problem of instant gratification, in regards, to the Pagan movement. How bad do all of you think this issue is? Is this issue something that can be remedied, and if it can not be remedied can it be at least herded into a nice little paddock? Also, do any of you see instant gratification beyond not understanding traditions, and spiritual practices?
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This