Hey guys, here's a fabulous topic for discussion: can one be a serious Pagan in spite of sexual hang-ups and the erotic nature of the Old Religion/s and the celebrated gods? I introduced the idea of fashioning phallic cakes and yoni-shaped cookies* for both a public Beltane event (one of my very favorite Sabbats), as well as a more private Coven ritual at my own expense. However, I was shot down by everyone even remotely involved. The men were phenomenally uncomfortable either eating anything anything even remotely phallic- or vulva-like, and one woman said that she would refuse on principal, unless such phallic cakes were being served at Bachelorette Party (which she seemed to imagine was the only appropriate a venue!). I swear, this must be a purely American attitude! Serve us right for letting Puritans colonize, and then allow the Religious Reich to hijack our culture! Does anyone have any ideas about how this situation might be best resolved for my local community, and the larger Pagan community in America? My very dear friend--the woman of whom I spoke--brought to my mind an important note of irony, however: it is well-established how bawdy the Bachelorette party can be, when the Sabbats all must express a similar note of frivolity rather than having distinctively sanitized Sabbats all for the sake of being PC. Why, even our own secular holiday celebrations are absolutely tame when compared with those from the conservative Medieval period with lecherous debauchery! They should be, and were probably intended as, a festival filled with laughter, delight, and ecstasy...themes that are sorely lacking on most of our present Pagan celebrations.
I must wonder what the impetus may be for this staunchly puritanical behavior! The body and the procreative organs are not something "dirty" or "naughty" and subject to censorship. hell, even the Gardnerian Charge of the Goddess (thanks to the fabulous Doreen Valiente--my personal hero!) proclaims, "All acts of love and pleasure are my rituals". So, why not celebrate this much more visually? Would it really be so bad, or truly regarded as offensive to the Pagan masses? And, if so, should they really be calling themselves "Pagan"?
Now, to see it from the other side of the fence, one might argue that phalloi have no place in ritual because they might: a.) ensure the harassment of the non-public public or officials. But, why should we follow their "guidelines" to such an extent anyway, when our views are clearly quite different? b.) we have to protect our children from unseemly images, because they may pervert their minds! However, I have it on very good authority that children grow up with a very healthy attitude towards their bodies and sex in general when exposed to such imagery. Hell, the whole, "we have to protect" so-and-so seems to fail when you take progressive European attitudes into account. Amsterdam, for instance, has a very famous red-light district (now a popular tourist attraction) where the prostitutes stand in glass windows advertising their "wears". Even ancient children would have been keenly aware of such imagery: the ancient Romans plastered the phallus over many doorways and wore it as an apotropaic amulet; and living room frescoes were also painted with erotic murals. So, what's wrong with my suggestion? And, why doesn't America seem to want to embrace other cultural identities in favor of socially conservative (read: "repressive") ends?
A few years ago I was speaking with a friend, a Pagan artisan, who was commissioned to fashion a life-size images of pan in which he used his own body (well, MOST of it! *G*) in order to sculpt the image. Obviously, because it was an image of Pan, he gave Him a fabulous (and HUGE) phallus! From the photos that I saw (this took place in a very large Midwestern Pagan gathering) the image was surrounded by offerings of all kinds, including ribbons tied about His "godhood". However, a group of women stormed to the camp-site of the folks who were on the board of the event, and demanded it be removed because it was "indecent"! What??? A phallic image of pan is "indecent"? Somehow I highly doubt that a nude image of a Goddess would have been criticized by them. And, how could these women not have understood the gravity of their request? The God, Himself, would have definitely been offended at their remark! yet, all-too-often i see images of the Horned One 9either commercially or in art) where he is distinctively neutered (even Classical reproductions). I also doubt, somehow, that these same women would have demanded that Michaelangelo's "David" would have been removed. So, why single out the phallus, and Pan? Is there something about the phallus that they cannot bring themselves to respect? Heck, I also wonder if men in refusing phallic cakes are doing so, perhaps, out of respect for their Pagan sisters? Yet, the Sabbats (particularly Beltane) is the time to break loose and bring your "Younger Self" (as Starhawk might have put it) out to play. I can absolutely see my brother or dad making some delightfully lewd joke at Beltane, or even taking the phallic cakes and wagging them about their belt-line in mirth, or with a wink. This is precisely the behavior that I expect of my Pagan brothers at Beltane. So, get in touch with your inner-Pagan male, guys! Indeed, I want to see far more phallic-worship as an expression of contemporary Pagan rituals.
It also bothers me, terribly, that by treating (especially) the phallus as taboo we are sending the wrong message which might reinforce a negative male body image for my/our Pagan brothers (even kids). Another reason why I believe that the phallus, in particular, is so taboo is because it might shatter our dewy-eyed or idealized image of who or what children are supposed to be or will become, regardless of the fact that they are animals just like us. After all, is teaching children about the phallus and vulva as sacred objects of veneration and praise and what these anatomical parts actual do in the act of creation (remember the original Wicker Man?) so different from Catholic catechism lessons where children are indoctrinated into believing that a wafer and a sip of wine literally become the flesh and blood of a long-since dead human being once it hits their tongue? I think that "cannibalism" is a lot more of a taboo than sex and the anatomy!
* Oh, and I was going to make some phallic-shaped cookies 9with white icing in all the right places) or cream-filled phallic cup-caked; and a vulva-shaped sandwich cookie with red jam inside and a concentric cookie on top in order to see the jam, with a red or pink candy morsel to serve as the clitoris. They are not exactly anatomical, after all; just schematics or representations. So, are these items really so distasteful? I don't believe that they are.